GEDmatch Implements Required Opt-In for Law Enforcement Matching
GEDmatch
is an open data personal genomics database and genealogy website
founded in 2010 by Curtis Rogers and John Olson. Its main purpose is to
help “amateur and professional researchers and genealogists,” including
adoptees searching for birth parents. However, it recently has also
become “the de facto DNA and genealogy database for all of law
enforcement,” according to
The Atlantic’s Sarah Zhang.
GEDmatch recently gained a lot of publicity after it was used by law
enforcement officials to identify a suspect in the Golden State Killer
case in California. Other law enforcement agencies started using
GEDmatch for violent crimes, making it one of the most powerful tools
available for identifying “cold case” criminals.
Sadly, the same site also has generated a lot of controversy
involving the lack of privacy of personal DNA information, both for the
people who uploaded their own DNA data and especially for the relatives
of the uploaders whose DNA information also was included without their
permission and usually without their knowledge. Such blatant disregard
for personal privacy may be a violation of privacy laws in many
countries.
The GEDmatch owners have now tightened the web site’s rules on
privacy. The result is expected to make it much more difficult for law
enforcement agencies to find suspects.
Judy Russell, often referred to as “The Legal Genealogist,” has
written an explanation of the issues involved and the reasons for the
decision by the GEDmatch owners. Judy wrote:
“The new system fully conforms to all
legal definitions of informed consent — particularly in light of the
candid admission in the terms that GEDmatch can’t promise there won’t be
new non-genealogical uses of the site someone figures out in the future
that nobody is even thinking of today — and to the provisions of the
European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as well.
“And it’s a good, right, ethical
decision. Doing as much as any website can to protect the trust of
genealogists that their DNA data will be used only for the purposes to
which they personally consent leaves the entire field on firmer ethical
ground.”
You can read a lot more in Judy Russell’s article at:
https://www.legalgenealogist.com/2019/05/19/gedmatch-reverses-course/.